[Bug 2355279] Review Request: rubygem-tcxread - tcx reader/parser in Ruby

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2355279

Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #1 from Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
A few comments.

1) If you keep something like `#Source:
https://rubygems.org/gems/%%{gem_name}-%%{version}.gem`, you can try to go with
`%dnl`. I.e. `%dnl Source:
https://rubygems.org/gems/%{gem_name}-%{version}.gem`. That way, you don't have
to escape the `%`.

2) What is the reason to go with the upstream tarball anyway? Is it the test?
Isn't it better to include just the test separately?

3) I'd suggest to improve the `description`. I see it comes from the .gemspec
like that, but we don't need to stick with that. The initial paragraph from the
README would be likely much better description.

4) We typically execute the test suite under `.%{gem_instdir}`. And this
actually might be related to (2). The reason is that the content in
`.%{gem_instdir}` is what is used in `%install` section. If there were done
some modifications, you'd like to test those.

5) I have some sympathy for `%exclude %{gem_docdir}/rdoc` (because the
situation could be better), but is it really worth of it?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2355279

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202355279%23c1

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux