On Thu, Sep 11 2025 at 05:00:05 PM +02:00:00, Fabio Valentini
<decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No, that would be wrong. The package didn't subsume those third-party
loaders - they were dropped completely, so it shouldn't Provide them.
I added Provides anyway, since otherwise we'll have a bunch of broken
packages in rawhide and F43. I think it's not too semantically
outrageous because the builtin loader really does support webp.
But I only added "Provides: webp-pixbuf-loader", not "Provides:
webp-pixbuf-loader%{?_isa} which is evidently required here. :(
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
