On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:40:51 +0200 Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:07:40 -0600 > Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 7/30/25 00:40, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > > > On 28.07.25 11:12, Dan Horák wrote: > > >> On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:40:03 +0200 > > >> Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> > > >> So there was a 64-bit instruction bundle at the patched offset, and that > > >> may have been the reason why ucx failed to patch properly. > > > > > > > > > Thanks - is this already being tracked somewhere? > > > > > > Sandro > > > > > > > It seems to be affecting a number of packages, netcdf as well. > > > > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/netcdf > > > > do we know what is responsible so we can file an issue? > > the root cause is ucx, which is affecting other packages via openmpi I am preparing an upstream ucx ticket right now ... Dan -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
