On 7/30/25 00:40, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 28.07.25 11:12, Dan Horák wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:40:03 +0200
Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So there was a 64-bit instruction bundle at the patched offset, and that
may have been the reason why ucx failed to patch properly.
Thanks - is this already being tracked somewhere?
Sandro
It seems to be affecting a number of packages, netcdf as well.
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/netcdf
do we know what is responsible so we can file an issue?
--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
