Hi Simo, > On 18. Jul 2025, at 15:08, Simo Sorce <simo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2025-07-18 at 13:47 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: >> * Simo Sorce [17/07/2025 19:24] : >>> >>> Can we talk about what the risk of that is? >>> Are we talking 30%, 3%, 0.3% 0.003% .. ? >> >> At Flock 2024, Tom Calloway explained to a group of us that if you start >> typing in the code of Doom in an AI-assisted editor, the editor will >> happily paste in the rest of the code, comments included. >> >> Doom's code is so optimised that it has been studied over and over again >> and been cited in a number of publications so that AIs have been >> over-trained on it. Granted, this is a special case but I suspect this >> is an issue we are going to run into, sooner or later. > > I am not sure how this is relevant unless you are trying to create a > Doom clone and start from the same code base? This particular anecdote was very likely about Doom’s fast inverse square root code, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_inverse_square_root. I’m sure you’d agree that there are many other use cases where one would need to compute 1/sqrt(x). Ending up with an exact copy of the Doom implementation really isn’t great from a copyright and license compliance point of view. -- Clemens Lang RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
