On Thu, 2025-07-17 at 15:18 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > In my opinion the situation is simple, as already several courts > hinted, the output of an AI cannot be copyrighted, and that makes sense > given Copyright hinges on protecting human creativity and AIs clearly > are not human. So Fedora could make a decision that the default license > for AI generated code is just "Public Domain". The most 'dangerous' case is the potential one where the AI system's output is a close copy of some pre-existing human-authored chunk of code, to the extent that the human author's copyright would apply to it. In that situation we may be violating their copyright by including it, depending on the license. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://www.happyassassin.net -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
