Re: Benchmark: X11 performs better than Wayland (on Plasma 6.4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/6/25 5:53 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Hi,

this benchmarks has some performance metrics for the same desktop
environment (Plasma 6.4) using Wayland vs. X11:
https://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/plasma-6-4-performance-wayland-x11-comparison.html

As you can see, X11 is faster and consumes fewer resources. (And that is
with X11 compositing enabled. The author hints that X11 is even faster if
you turn off compositing, but unfortunately does not share the numbers for
that.)

         Kevin Kofler


The article starts off mentioning a driver bug and doesn't mention how testing was done so I think its fair to say and the data means nothing.

Jan
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux