On 2025-06-24 22:02, Florian Weimer wrote:
Are you suggesting to move RHEL 11 development away from Fedora/ELN to CentOS Stream? Wouldn't that be implied by this approach?
Not at all. My point was that if you want a platform to run experiments, the CentOS ISA SIG seems like a better fit, as it would give you more freedom to try things out. Changing things in ELN has a larger blast radius, and IMO it'd be best to do that once we're closer to a settled solution.
I think we should align the ELN build configuration with the current plans for RHEL 11 instead. Enabling frame pointers on x86-64 in ELN when there is no such plan for RHEL has always been against ELN's purpose to approximate a RHEL configuration.
For reference, frame pointers were enabled in ELN in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/a65dee421c05707d6aaaed30ea5e19278422ea58 based on the discussion in https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/ODSVQKC2HHO5W3JD63DW3C53DG5WATUA/ with the plan to revisit things closer to RHEL 11 branching.
Cheers Davide -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
