Re: Double Precision Build for Bullet Physics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Any movement on this? MyGUI is in the process of being unretired and once it is I'd like to get to work packaging openMW ASAP. Am I good to use a double precision build linked statically, or should I wait?

On 6/8/25 21:28, Cristian Le via devel wrote:

On 8 June 2025 21:01:03 CEST, Claire R <inquiries@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is upsetream in this case referring to openMW or bullet physics?
Was referring to bullet physics upstream and how it doesn't respond to open PRs.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux