Vitaly Zaitsev wrote: > On 28/05/2025 22:19, Chris Adams wrote: > > So it's been another month and this still isn't resolved. I know people > > on the Fedora side have been trying (don't want to complain about > > effort). But if Fedora can't reliably get timely updates to a package > > that has high security implications, it should NOT be enabled by > > default, or even shipped by Fedora at all. > > I have a better option than completely removing it: adding this package > to the RPM Fusion repository (rpmfusion-free) with a higher Release > number (starting from 100, for example). > Users who have RPM Fusion enabled will get a well-maintained and updated > version from this repository. > I think this is the best option at the moment. I'm totally against the cisco trash being moved to rpmfusion. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
