On Sun, Apr 27, 2025 at 5:05 PM Björn Persson <Bjorn@rombobjörn.se> wrote: > > Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hum, it appears that the method documented here does not work as I > > would have expected: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_one_to_many_replacement > > I added the Obsoletes to the new subpackages that wouldn't get > > installed by default, but they're not getting pulled in on updates ... > > not sure why. > > The main package must also obsolete itself. Otherwise it doesn't work. > Don't ask me to explain why. > > I tried to stress that point. Can you suggest better wording to get the > point across? Thanks, after re-reading this paragraph like 3 times I get it now :D """ If the name of the original package still exists after the split, that package needs to obsolete itself. Even if an optional split-out package requires the original package, the original package still must obsolete itself. Otherwise the split-out package won’t be pulled in. """ I think it is clear, if quite dense. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
