Re: F43 Change Proposal: Modular GnuPG packaging (self-contained)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hum, it appears that the method documented here does not work as I
> would have expected:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_one_to_many_replacement
> I added the Obsoletes to the new subpackages that wouldn't get
> installed by default, but they're not getting pulled in on updates ...
> not sure why.

The main package must also obsolete itself. Otherwise it doesn't work.
Don't ask me to explain why.

I tried to stress that point. Can you suggest better wording to get the
point across?

Björn Persson

Attachment: pgpEH4Dh390Md.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux