On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:14:08PM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 at 12:10, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:43:38AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > > > > Has anyone gone through the effort of removing i686 from a wide reaching > > non-leaf package? Any advice appreciated > > Can we just stop building for i686 in Fedora in general, instead of burning > maintainer time figuring out deps problems like this... ? What's the > blocker and how much longer do we have to put up with its burden in Fedora > ? > > > > The blocker is someone making a Change Request and then going to the Fedora 43 > CR meetings with FESCO :). I think the only blocker has been Steam games. Wine was another one, but I think that got fixed upstream. What about Webex, the awful video conferencing software? I've no desire to investigate this, but ISTR it linked to system i686 libs. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
