On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 6:19 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:57 AM Milan Crha <mcrha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > Common history was always a thing. > > > > Hi, > > are you sure? The `pkcon update` is not part of the `dnf4 history`, is > > it? I cannot imagine how that could be, but it's a long time I looked > > on any such thing, thus I could be wrong. > > > > It definitely is. In fact, I enabled autoremove support in > PackageKit-DNF because we have been recording the history, and so the > reason data is useful. But I thought that dnf5 and dnf-3 don't share that database? i.e. the database is only imported on first run by dnf5 and then gets out of sync? Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
