On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 11:57 AM Milan Crha <mcrha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2025-04-14 at 16:48 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Common history was always a thing. > > Hi, > are you sure? The `pkcon update` is not part of the `dnf4 history`, is > it? I cannot imagine how that could be, but it's a long time I looked > on any such thing, thus I could be wrong. > It definitely is. In fact, I enabled autoremove support in PackageKit-DNF because we have been recording the history, and so the reason data is useful. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
