On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 05:39, Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 9:32 AM Lukas Javorsky <ljavorsk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Is the main reason lack of maintainers? Many of these C packages work well on constrained and embedded devices.
>
> Yes, nobody wanted to maintain it and the current maintainer doesn't want it either.
Lack of maintainer upstream or in Fedora?
If it's the latter, I would suggest orphaning the package instead of
dropping it.
It looks like there are at least a handful of packages that still need it.
He was talking about the upstream maintainer in the GNU org wanting to drop it as it is not something they want to continue working on.
Fabio
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
