Re: SPDX Statistics - 115 packages remaining

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

...

> Packages that are neither in SPDX nor in Callaway format (highest
> priority for now) - 32 packages:
>
> https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/neither-nor-remaining-packagers.txt
>
> Most of such packages has open issue in fedora-license-data. A lot of them are waiting for SPDX to approved the license 
> and assign ID.


Out of curiosity, what's wrong with kernel? I remember we converted it
to SPDX some time ago. E.g.:

$ rpm -qp --queryformat "%{LICENSE}\n" kernel-6.14.0-63.fc42.x86_64.rpm 
((GPL-2.0-only WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) AND ((GPL-2.0-only WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) AND ((GPL-2.0-only WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR CDDL-1.0) AND ((GPL-2.0-only WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR Linux-OpenIB) AND ((GPL-2.0-only WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) AND ((GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) AND ((GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) AND 0BSD AND BSD-2-Clause AND (BSD-2-Clause OR Apache-2.0) AND BSD-3-Clause AND BSD-3-Clause-Clear AND CC0-1.0 AND GFDL-1.1-no-invariants-or-later AND GPL-1.0-or-later AND (GPL-1.0-or-later OR BSD-3-Clause) AND (GPL-1.0-or-later WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND GPL-2.0-only AND (GPL-2.0-only OR Apache-2.0) AND (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) AND (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause) AND (GPL-2.0-only OR CDDL-1.0) AND (GPL-2.0-only OR GFDL-1.1-no-invariants-or-later) AND (GPL-2.0-only OR GFDL-1.2-no-invariants-only) AND (GPL-2.0-only WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND GPL-2.0-or-later AND (GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-2-Clause) AND (GPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-3-Clause) AND (GPL-2.0-or-later OR CC-BY-4.0) AND (GPL-2.0-or-later WITH GCC-exception-2.0) AND (GPL-2.0-or-later WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND ISC AND LGPL-2.0-or-later AND (LGPL-2.0-or-later OR BSD-2-Clause) AND (LGPL-2.0-or-later WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND LGPL-2.1-only AND (LGPL-2.1-only OR BSD-2-Clause) AND (LGPL-2.1-only WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND LGPL-2.1-or-later AND (LGPL-2.1-or-later WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND (Linux-OpenIB OR GPL-2.0-only) AND (Linux-OpenIB OR GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) AND Linux-man-pages-copyleft AND MIT AND (MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND (MIT OR GPL-2.0-only) AND (MIT OR GPL-2.0-or-later) AND (MIT OR LGPL-2.1-only) AND (MPL-1.1 OR GPL-2.0-only) AND (X11 OR GPL-2.0-only) AND (X11 OR GPL-2.0-or-later) AND Zlib AND (copyleft-next-0.3.1 OR GPL-2.0-or-later)

Is it just BSD-3-Clause-Clear issue
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/375 or is
there anything else?

FWIW, BSD-3-Clause-Clear seems to be used by ath11k/ath12k modules only.

-- 
Vitaly

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux