Hi
I just think it would be great to have under
https://download.ceph.com/rpm-19.2.3/
the folders:
el8/
el9/ (and this being build on rocky or alma)
centos9-stream/ (renamed the el9)
And with upcoming RHEL10 support
maybe
centos10-stream/
el10/
el10_v2/
At least when the mock build *just work*. Of course it would be
tremendous effort to thoroughly test all platforms, but just running
another mock is just a bit of time and disk space and would make the
communities life much easier.
Best
Mo
Am 01.08.2025 um 10:42 schrieb Moritz Baumann:
While it is true that Alma *also* addresses v2 it offers v3 as *default*
as well.
So I feel better with alma (because it allows me to run alma10 on older
hardware if I pick the x86_64_v2 architecture).
Am 01.08.2025 um 09:34 schrieb Alexander Patrakov:
Just as another consideration, AlmaLinux is targeting x86_64 v2, while
other RHEL clones target v3. So, basing Ceph builds and containers on
AlmaLinux will make containerized builds assembled from these RPMs more
compatible with ancient hardware still found in labs, and with test
clusters running on misconfigured third-party cloud hypervisors.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 3:30 PM Patrick Begou <
Patrick.Begou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Michel,
and what about using Almalinux for your build ? In my mind Almalinux is
closest to REHL as Rocky linux kernels are more advanced. Just to
maximize the compatibility of the x86_64 rpm.
Patrick
Le 31/07/2025 à 22:31, Michel Jouvin a écrit :
Hi Dan,
I think it would be a good move. Now that CentOS Stream has been
repurposed as a RHEL upstream instead of downstream as it was
initially, it really makes sense. I would not expect any trouble for
CS users as the backward compatibility is maintained in CS as un RHEL
The problem that happened with recent Ceph rebuilds is because CS by
design introduces things not yet present in RHEL releases and it's
derivatives.
Best regards,
Michel
Sent from my mobile
Le 31 juillet 2025 18:34:32 Dan van der Ster
<dan.vanderster@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 8:06 AM Moritz Baumann <mo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I have problems upgrading ceph from
https://download.ceph.com/rpm-19.2.3/el9/x86_64/
and have broken dependencies on host running Almalinux 9.6
So:
ceph orch upgrade start --ceph_version 19.2.3
works,
but a dnf --refresh upgrade on ceph nodes gives broken dependencies
ceph-poc1[0]:~# dnf --refresh upgrade
...
Error:
Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
ceph-common-2:19.2.2-0.el9.x86_64
- nothing provides libcrypto.so.3(OPENSSL_3.4.0)(64bit) needed by
ceph-common-2:19.2.3-0.el9.x86_64 from Ceph
Thanks for sharing this. The upstream build team is aware of this (and
the same issue in reef) and actively are working on a path forward.
It's unfortunate that Stream broke compatibility this way -- the team
is testing the impact if we move to Rocky 9 going forward for
reef/squid.
One concern is if such a change might similarly break our Stream 9
users -- but... are there any Stream 9 users out there?
Cheers, dan
--
Dan van der Ster
Ceph Executive Council | CTO @ CLYSO
Try our Ceph Analyzer -- https://analyzer.clyso.com/
https://clyso.com | dan.vanderster@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
