Just as another consideration, AlmaLinux is targeting x86_64 v2, while other RHEL clones target v3. So, basing Ceph builds and containers on AlmaLinux will make containerized builds assembled from these RPMs more compatible with ancient hardware still found in labs, and with test clusters running on misconfigured third-party cloud hypervisors. On Fri, Aug 1, 2025 at 3:30 PM Patrick Begou < Patrick.Begou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Michel, > > and what about using Almalinux for your build ? In my mind Almalinux is > closest to REHL as Rocky linux kernels are more advanced. Just to > maximize the compatibility of the x86_64 rpm. > > Patrick > > Le 31/07/2025 à 22:31, Michel Jouvin a écrit : > > Hi Dan, > > > > I think it would be a good move. Now that CentOS Stream has been > > repurposed as a RHEL upstream instead of downstream as it was > > initially, it really makes sense. I would not expect any trouble for > > CS users as the backward compatibility is maintained in CS as un RHEL > > The problem that happened with recent Ceph rebuilds is because CS by > > design introduces things not yet present in RHEL releases and it's > > derivatives. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Michel > > Sent from my mobile > > Le 31 juillet 2025 18:34:32 Dan van der Ster > > <dan.vanderster@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit : > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 8:06 AM Moritz Baumann <mo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >>> > >>> I have problems upgrading ceph from > >>> > >>> https://download.ceph.com/rpm-19.2.3/el9/x86_64/ > >>> > >>> and have broken dependencies on host running Almalinux 9.6 > >>> > >>> So: > >>> > >>> ceph orch upgrade start --ceph_version 19.2.3 > >>> > >>> works, > >>> but a dnf --refresh upgrade on ceph nodes gives broken dependencies > >>> > >>> ceph-poc1[0]:~# dnf --refresh upgrade > >>> ... > >>> Error: > >>> Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package > >>> ceph-common-2:19.2.2-0.el9.x86_64 > >>> - nothing provides libcrypto.so.3(OPENSSL_3.4.0)(64bit) needed by > >>> ceph-common-2:19.2.3-0.el9.x86_64 from Ceph > >> > >> Thanks for sharing this. The upstream build team is aware of this (and > >> the same issue in reef) and actively are working on a path forward. > >> It's unfortunate that Stream broke compatibility this way -- the team > >> is testing the impact if we move to Rocky 9 going forward for > >> reef/squid. > >> > >> One concern is if such a change might similarly break our Stream 9 > >> users -- but... are there any Stream 9 users out there? > >> > >> Cheers, dan > >> > >> -- > >> Dan van der Ster > >> Ceph Executive Council | CTO @ CLYSO > >> Try our Ceph Analyzer -- https://analyzer.clyso.com/ > >> https://clyso.com | dan.vanderster@xxxxxxxxx > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > >> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx > -- Alexander Patrakov _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |