Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] net/smc: fix UAF on smcsk after smc_listen_out()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 08:33:56AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:24:50 +0200 Alexandra Winter wrote:
> > > Yes, it should be sent to net. But the problem is that if I don't carry
> > > this patch, the BPF CI test will always crash. Maybe I should send a
> > > copy to both net and bpf-next? Do you have any suggestions?
> > 
> > I do not have any experience with bpf-next. But typically patches
> > to 'net' are taken after one or two days, if there are no issues.
> > I'd assume they are then picked to net-next and bpf-next(?) almost instantly.
> > Then you would not need it in your bpf series anymore.
> 
> AFAIU the patches which land in net will make it to -next trees after
> respective PR with fixes. So
> 
> 
>  patch -> 
>           net ->
>                  [next Thu] Linus ->
>                                       [same day] net-next
>                                       [at some point] bpf PR ->
>                                                                  Linux
>                                                                         -> bpf-next
> 
> What gets applied to net should be in net-next in a week,
> and most -next trees within 2 weeks.

That's very helpful.

Based on those infomations, I will send this prerequisite patch to the net
tree first. I'll then wait for about two weeks for it to propagate to
bpf-next before submitting the rest of my BPF series.

Best regards,
D. Wythe




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux