Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] net/smc: fix UAF on smcsk after smc_listen_out()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 11 Aug 2025 11:24:50 +0200 Alexandra Winter wrote:
> > Yes, it should be sent to net. But the problem is that if I don't carry
> > this patch, the BPF CI test will always crash. Maybe I should send a
> > copy to both net and bpf-next? Do you have any suggestions?
> 
> I do not have any experience with bpf-next. But typically patches
> to 'net' are taken after one or two days, if there are no issues.
> I'd assume they are then picked to net-next and bpf-next(?) almost instantly.
> Then you would not need it in your bpf series anymore.

AFAIU the patches which land in net will make it to -next trees after
respective PR with fixes. So


 patch -> 
          net ->
                 [next Thu] Linus ->
                                      [same day] net-next
                                      [at some point] bpf PR ->
                                                                 Linux
                                                                        -> bpf-next

What gets applied to net should be in net-next in a week,
and most -next trees within 2 weeks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux