On 2025-07-11 16:09:31, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 09 Jul 2025 14:47:56 +0200 Vincent Whitchurch via B4 Relay > wrote: > > I noticed that if the verdict callback returns SK_PASS, using splice(2) > > to read from a socket in a sockmap does not work since it never sees the > > data queued on to it. As far as I can see, this is not a regression but > > just something that has never worked, but it does make sockmap unusable > > if you can't guarantee that the programs using the socket will not use > > splice(2). > > On v2 you should you can't replace ops for passively opened > connections. Can that not be addressed instead of adding > an indirect call on the data path? I guess I missed above? We can create the psock and add the socket to a map on the accept()? It would be good to get some fix for this. Thanks, John
