On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 5:39 PM <patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello: > > This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) > by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 18:41:24 +0200 you wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I tried running the arena_spin_lock test on s390x and ran into the > > following issues: > > > > * Changing the header file does not lead to rebuilding the test. > > * The checked for number of CPUs and the actually required number of > > CPUs are different. > > * Endianness issue in spinlock definition. > > > > [...] > > Here is the summary with links: > - [1/3] selftests/bpf: Fix arena_spin_lock.c build dependency > https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ddfd1f30b5ba > - [2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix arena_spin_lock on systems with less than 16 CPUs > https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/0240e5a9431c > - [3/3] selftests/bpf: Fix endianness issue in __qspinlock declaration > https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/be5521991506 > > You are awesome, thank you! It was applied to bpf-next for real.
