On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 09:13:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 07:01:36PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 04:45:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
> > > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
> > > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
> > > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
> > > for the subsystem are normally handled.
>
> > I truly believe the 5 month is reasonable time for review, no?
>
> You're missing the part about how you should resend instead.
Noted, thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
[Index of Archives]
[Pulseaudio]
[Linux Audio Users]
[ALSA Devel]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Yosemite News]
[KDE Users]