On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 04:55:53PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:09:43AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > The fwnode.h is not supposed to be used by the drivers as it > > has the definitions for the core parts for different device > > property provider implementations. Drop it. > > > > Note, that fwnode API for drivers is provided in property.h > > which is included here. > > Any news here? Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: Remove (explicitly) unused header
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: Remove (explicitly) unused header
- References:
- [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: Remove (explicitly) unused header
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: Remove (explicitly) unused header
- From: Andy Shevchenko
- [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: Remove (explicitly) unused header
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: Remove (explicitly) unused header
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 01/20] bitmap: introduce hardware-specific bitfield operations
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: Remove (explicitly) unused header
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: Remove (explicitly) unused header
- Index(es):
![]() |