Re: [PATCH 2/3] docs: backup: Hint at proper selinux labelling of the FD-passed NBD socket

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 18:41:45 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> On a Monday in 2025, Peter Krempa via Devel wrote:
> > From: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > In case selinux is used on the host the socket passed to qemu needs to
> > be properly labelled. Add a hint to the example code.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > docs/formatbackup.rst | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/docs/formatbackup.rst b/docs/formatbackup.rst
> > index 155a45a22f..df6392e3bd 100644
> > --- a/docs/formatbackup.rst
> > +++ b/docs/formatbackup.rst
> > @@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ were supplied). The following child elements and attributes are supported:
> > 
> >      import socket
> >      import libvirt
> > +     import selinux
> > +
> > +     # Optionally setup selinux context for the socket if the distro uses it
> > +     # selinux.setsockcreatecon_raw("system_u:object_r:svirt_t:s0")
> 
> Should this hint that the category should also match the domain, to be
> "properly" labelled?

Well, possibly; but this is actually enough to make it work. I didn't
care digging deeper.




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux