On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 1:06 AM Taavi Eomäe <taaviw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 3/25/25 06:50, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > I do wonder if it's reasonable to apply > > non-specific SRD rules to WLAN (it probably is OK), and whether it > > is actually useful or not given the drastically different power > > limits. > > If I understood you correctly, if someone is located in an environment > where DFS channels are vacant, it should be possible to practically use > that section at a lower power limit defined by SRD rules. > > The very least it should allow people (including myself) to just run > tests with wider channels. I understand that this is a valid use case, and I will accept the change. I just wonder if the very low limit of 25 mW would be useful in actual settings such as in a building with concrete walls. The transmit power limit is not immediately visible to users; non-technical users might select this channel and not realize the very low limit and experience bad performance. > > I'll update the wording when applying. > > Thanks, much appreciated. > > I also just noticed that there's some linkrot with > "https://www.ttja.ee/et/ettevottele-organisatsioonile/sideteenused/raadioseadmed/wifi-seade";, > the working link would be > "https://ttja.ee/eraklient/side-ja-meediateenused/raadioside/wifi-seadmete-kasutus";. > > Should I submit a new patch to update that or could you incorporate this > minor touch-up as well? I guess you could send a new patch for the record. Thanks ChenYu
