--- On Wed, 7/16/08, Rhino <rhino@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Rhino <rhino@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Recommended cache_dir config for large system]
> To: richard_hubbe11@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008, 2:53 PM
> Richard Hubbell wrote:
> >> THanks much for the quick response, Henrik.
> >> Filesystem for cache disks currently configured
> for
> >> reiserfs with
> >> notail/noatime opts.
> >> I did not have the fd amounts set, nor
> ip_local_port_range.
> >> My cache_dirs have each disk mounted as partition,
> i.e.
> >> disk1=/squid1
> >> disk2=/squid2; would your suggestion
> >> be then to halve each disk and partition each as
> cache_dir?
> >> (i.e, go
> >> from squid1-4 to squid1-8 across the 4 disks)
> >> Also have a 5th disk of equal size that has to be
> used for
> >> OS, just fyi
> >> - so these 4 are totally dedicated to Squid.
> >> thanks again, appreciate your input.
> >> -Ryan
> >
> > Just curious why reiserfs? I don't think it's
> supported any longer.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> size/speed considerations when we set the system up
> originally. It's
> worked well so far.
> cheers
Okay, do you mean better performance with larger number of files?
I'm using ext3 that's why I'm asking.
