---- On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 12:11:13 -0300 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote --- > On 2025-04-17 10:10:43 [-0300], Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > > > > > ---- On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 07:04:10 -0300 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote --- > > > > > On 2025-04-14 12:14:44 [-0300], Gustavo Padovan wrote: > > > > Hi Sebastian, > > > Hi Gustavo, > > > > > > > In my understanding you want to know when results for any rt-tests change status (eg PASS -> FAIL or > > > > vice versa) for a selection of trees (eg mainline, next, etc). Can you confirm? > > > > > > The results change is definitely interesting. The other thing is what is > > > tested and how. I remember you added/ changed some architectures for the > > > RT subset. I also assume that warnings at bootime (as in lockdep or > > > general warnings) are reported. > > > > We have some support around that, but this work is still evolving. > > Okay. > > > > I remember Daniel asked for some cyclictests/rt-tests integration so I > > > don't know what is tested here ;) > > > > > > From the commandline you sent that there are a few boards running the > > > cyclictests and everything either passes or is in state "INCONCLUSIVE". > > > So this looks nice. > > > > Okay. > > > > As for notifications, for which trees/branches you want to see it? > > Linus' master and the -next tree would be good. If you plan add to add > Cc here, it would be nice if you could add linux-rt-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sounds good. Let me look at how to enable that in the coming weeks, as today we don't support report "profiles" for a given tree.. Eg, the mainline report comes with all the tests[1], but that would be noise to you. [0] https://groups.io/g/kernelci-results/message/58797 Best, - Gus
