When specified with WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE, the workqueue doesn't
participate in concurrency management. This behaviour is already
accounted for WQ_UNBOUND workqueues given that they are assigned
to their own worker threads.
Unset WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE as the use of flag has no effect when
used with WQ_UNBOUND.
Signed-off-by: Ryo Takakura <ryotkkr98@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Hi!
My understanding is that unbound wqs are served by non concurrency
managed worker threads and is not tracked by wq_cpu_intensive_report(),
so this should have no change in behaviour.
Sincerely,
Ryo Takakura
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 638938316..8f3b45161 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -9048,7 +9048,7 @@ static int __init raid5_init(void)
int ret;
raid5_wq = alloc_workqueue("raid5wq",
- WQ_UNBOUND|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM|WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE|WQ_SYSFS, 0);
+ WQ_UNBOUND|WQ_MEM_RECLAIM|WQ_SYSFS, 0);
if (!raid5_wq)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.34.1
