Linux RAID Storage Date Index

[Prev Page][Next Page]
- [PATCH 6/6] tests/10ddf-incremental-wrong-order: new unit test
- [PATCH 4/6] tests/env-ddf-template: add helper function for checksums
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Karel Walters <karel.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] tests/10ddf-fail-readd-readonly: new unit test.
- [PATCH 2/3] tests/env-ddf-template: fix container name
- Detecting that an array has been stopped
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Monitor: write meta data in readonly state, sometimes
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] *DO NOT APPLY* DDF: add_to_super_ddf: leave invalid secondary_lba untouched
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Karel Walters <karel.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: be careful with workspace_lba
- [PATCH 1/2] DDF: add_to_super_ddf: leave invalid secondary_lba untouched
- [PATCH 0/2] Fix mdadm --add for LSI fake RAID
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Karel Walters <karel.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Recovery] RAID10 hdd failureS help requested
- From: Karel Walters <karel.walters@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: "Bradley D. Thornton" <Bradley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Strange RAID 1 rebuild problem
- From: Andreas Heinlein <aheinlein@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: (Solved) Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] tests/10ddf-fail-readd: New DDF unit test
- [PATCH 2/2] tests/10ddf-fail-stop-readd: New DDF unit test
- Re: (Solved) Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Sachin Garg <sgarg.bugreporter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mke2fs with discard option breaks RAID5 array
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- reboot during raid1 resync considered harmful?
- From: Karl Kiniger <karl.kiniger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Array member "role numbers" in /proc/mdstat
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Array member "role numbers" in /proc/mdstat
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Array member "role numbers" in /proc/mdstat
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Sachin Garg <sgarg.bugreporter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5+spare volume gone - mdadm sees RAID1 only?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUG]NULL Pointer dereference in rdev_set_badblocks
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5+spare volume gone - mdadm sees RAID1 only?
- From: P Agenbag <internet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- How to create a near-far array
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID5+spare volume gone - mdadm sees RAID1 only?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RAID5+spare volume gone - mdadm sees RAID1 only?
- From: P Agenbag <internet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Problems with RAID 4/5/6 and kmem_cache
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Desperate: mdadm fails to assemble raid saying devices are busy.
- From: Sachin Garg <sgarg.bugreporter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Why hardware RAID controllers when talking about mdadm?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Testing /proc/mdstat parsing
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Why hardware RAID controllers when talking about mdadm?
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- RFC: incremental container assembly when sequence numbers don't match
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question on DDF degraded array
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Question on DDF degraded array
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Anomaly with 2 x 840Pro SSDs in software raid 1
- From: Andrei Banu <andrei.banu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Anomaly with 2 x 840Pro SSDs in software raid 1
- From: Andrei Banu <andrei.banu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Raid 5 Array 3/4 Drives non-fresh
- From: John <linux_mailing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Unable to start RAID5 array
- From: Sachin Garg <sgarg.bugreporter@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] RAID5: Change kmem_cache name string of RAID 4/5/6 stripe cache
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Problems with RAID 4/5/6 and kmem_cache
- From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Robert Schultz <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Benjamin ESTRABAUD <be@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Moving drives around for a new one
- From: Jonathan Wilson <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Moving drives around for a new one
- From: "Timothy D. Lenz" <tlenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Robert Schultz <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Tommy Apel <tommyapeldk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Best configuration for bcache/md cache or other cache using ssd
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Remove bashism from Makefile
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Mdadm 3.3 reshape issue
- From: Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm 3.3 reshape issue
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mdadm 3.3 reshape issue
- From: Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@xxxxxxxxx>
- Remove bashism from Makefile
- From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LSI 9211 (SAS2008) BIOS problems, invalid PCI slot
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LSI 9211 (SAS2008) BIOS problems, invalid PCI slot
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LSI 9211 (SAS2008) BIOS problems, invalid PCI slot
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: LSI 9211 (SAS2008) BIOS problems, invalid PCI slot
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] DDF: compare_super_ddf: fix sequence number check
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Moving drives around for a new one
- From: "Timothy D. Lenz" <tlenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid10 recovery assistance requested
- From: Dave Gomboc <dave_gomboc@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- LSI 9211 (SAS2008) BIOS problems, invalid PCI slot
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Robert Schultz <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Monitor: don't set arrays dirty after transition to read-only
- Re: "detect reshape on array start" (was Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3))
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- "detect reshape on array start" (was Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3))
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] DDF tests: allow to run on systems without /dev/sda
- [PATCH 3/3] DDF: compare_super_ddf: fix sequence number check
- [PATCH 2/3] DDF test: make sure mdmon isn't started by systemd
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- mke2fs with discard option breaks RAID5 array
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: How-to for enabling TRIM for SSD RAID-1 arrays?
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inoperative array shown as "active"
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Inoperative array shown as "active"
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Inoperative array shown as "active"
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How-to for enabling TRIM for SSD RAID-1 arrays?
- From: Derek Piper <derek.piper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Moving drives around for a new one
- From: "Timothy D. Lenz" <tlenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How-to for enabling TRIM for SSD RAID-1 arrays?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How-to for enabling TRIM for SSD RAID-1 arrays?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: How-to for enabling TRIM for SSD RAID-1 arrays?
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- How-to for enabling TRIM for SSD RAID-1 arrays?
- From: Derek Piper <derek.piper@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Implementing --detail-platform for DDF
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- RAID 5 3-drive array failed 2 disks at once - can anything be saved?
- From: Robert Schultz <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mdadm 3.3 fails to kick out non fresh disk
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Implementing --detail-platform for DDF
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdmon: honour --offroot, again
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Installing openSUSE 12.3 on DDF fake RAID with mdadm
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdmon: honour --offroot, again
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Implementing --detail-platform for DDF
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Weirdness with DDF arrays (mdadm 3.3)
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 回复: [RFC PATCH V3] raid1: rewrite the iobarrier ― Linux RAID Storage
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH v2] md/raid5: avoid deadlock when raid5 array has unack badblocks during md_stop_writes.
- From: ycbzzjlby <ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Implementing --detail-platform for DDF
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md/raid5: fresh drive rebuild always requires a fullsync if interrupted
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdmon: honour --offroot, again
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: change '%' to condition
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] md/raid5: avoid deadlock when raid5 array has unack badblocks during md_stop_writes.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: change '%' to condition
- From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx>
- change '%' to condition
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Implementing --detail-platform for DDF
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mdmon: honour --offroot, again
- [PATCH 2/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- [PATCH 1/2] DDF: factor out array name generation
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- md/raid5: fresh drive rebuild always requires a fullsync if interrupted
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] md/raid5: avoid deadlock when raid5 array has unack badblocks during md_stop_writes.
- From: ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Managing mdam
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Managing mdam
- From: "Francois Billard" <francois.billard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: Jack Wang <xjtuwjp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: CoolCold <coolthecold@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] bcache: defensively handle format strings
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] raid5: Retry R5_ReadNoMerge flag when hit a read error.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Managing mdam
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- write-refresh md array (feature request)
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] raid5: Retry R5_ReadNoMerge flag when hit a read error.
- From: ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: Drew <drew.kay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: Andrew Brooks <arb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Managing mdam
- From: Francois Billard <francois.billard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Subject: [PATCH] md: avoid deadlock when raid5 array has unack badblocks during md_stop_writes.
- From: y b <ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Subject: [PATCH] md: avoid deadlock when raid5 array has unack badblocks during md_stop_writes.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: [PATCH] md: avoid deadlock when raid5 array has unack badblocks during md_stop_writes.
- From: y b <ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PULL REQUEST] md update for v3.12
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] DDF: new algorithm for subarray UUID
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] DDF: handle fake RAIDs with changing subarray UUIDs
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Manage.c: fix small memory leak
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update email for Dan Williams
- From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- Installing SLES11 on DDF fake RAID with mdadm
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: "Timothy D. Lenz" <tlenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] DDF: handle fake RAIDs with changing subarray UUIDs
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] DDF: new algorithm for subarray UUID
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: Jonathan Wilson <piercing_male@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: Tudor Holton <tudor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mixing WD red with older seagates
- From: "Timothy D. Lenz" <tlenz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Update to mdadm V3.2.5 => RAID starts to recover (reproducible)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] DDF: new algorithm for subarray UUID
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 array assembled from 11 drives and 2 spares - not enough to start the array
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 array assembled from 11 drives and 2 spares - not enough to start the array
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 array assembled from 11 drives and 2 spares - not enough to start the array
- From: Garðar Arnarsson <gardar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 array assembled from 11 drives and 2 spares - not enough to start the array
- From: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid6 array assembled from 11 drives and 2 spares - not enough to start the array
- From: Garðar Arnarsson <gardar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- raid6 array assembled from 11 drives and 2 spares - not enough to start the array
- From: Garðar Arnarsson <gardar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] DDF: new algorithm for subarray UUID
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Veedar Hokstadt <veedar@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] DDF: new algorithm for subarray UUID
- [PATCH 1/2] DDF: brief_examine_subarrays_ddf: print array name
- Re: Problem halting raid 1
- From: Tregaron Bayly <tbayly@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem halting raid 1
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem halting raid 1
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem halting raid 1
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Problem halting raid 1
- From: Miguel Corberán Ruiz <migcorrui@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Update to mdadm V3.2.5 => RAID starts to recover (reproducible)
- From: Andreas Baer <synthetic.gods@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Manage.c: fix small memory leak
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [Question] Fail event during reshape raid5 -> raid6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- mdadm 3.3: issue with mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- [Question] Fail event during reshape raid5 -> raid6
- From: "Roland 'ValiDOM' Jungnickel" <vali2013@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: ANNOUNCE: mdadm 3.3 - A tools for managing md Soft RAID under Linux
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] mdmon: allow disabling "@dmon" command name at compile time
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] mdmon: allow disabling "@dmon" command name at compile time
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Update to mdadm V3.2.5 => RAID starts to recover (reproducible)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] mdmon: allow disabling "@dmon" command name at compile time
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 5/5] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] mdmon: allow disabling "@dmon" command name at compile time
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Failed to find backup of critical section
- From: Nathan Shearer <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Failed to find backup of critical section
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Failed to find backup of critical section
- From: Nathan Shearer <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Unmount a raid device during recovery in progress
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Unmount a raid device during recovery in progress
- From: Zoltán Török <torokze@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Roman Mamedov <rm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Veedar Hokstadt <veedar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid 5 with 2 failed drives
- From: "Tsaousis, Costa" <costa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Is a raid0 512 byte chunk size possible? Or is it just too small?
- From: Veedar Hokstadt <veedar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid 5 with 2 failed drives
- From: "Tsaousis, Costa" <costa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Update to mdadm V3.2.5 => RAID starts to recover (reproducible)
- From: Andreas Baer <synthetic.gods@xxxxxxxxx>
- RAID 10 on Fusion IO cards problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 5/5] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 1/5] raid5: make release_stripe lockless
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 1/5] raid5: make release_stripe lockless
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 1/5] raid5: make release_stripe lockless
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] raid1: Add some macros to make code clearly.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] radi1: Relace raise_barrier/lower_barrrier with freeze_array/unfreeze_array for reconfigure the array.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] raid1: Add a filed array_frozen to indicate whether raid in freeze state.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 5/5] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 3/5] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 2/5] raid5: fix stripe release order
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 5/5] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 3/5] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 2/5] raid5: fix stripe release order
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] mdmon: allow disabling "@dmon" command name at compile time
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/6] in_initrd: fix gcc compiler error
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/6] DDF: ddf_activate_spare: fix gcc -O2 uninitialized warning
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 5/5] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 3/5] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch v3 2/5] raid5: fix stripe release order
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [patch v3 5/5] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch v3 4/5] raid5: sysfs entry to control worker thread number
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch v3 3/5] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch v3 2/5] raid5: fix stripe release order
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch v3 1/5] raid5: make release_stripe lockless
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch v3 0/5] raid5: make stripe handling multi-threading
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 0/3 v2] raid5: make stripe handling multi-threading
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Disk with backup-file died during reshape
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Disk with backup-file died during reshape
- From: Iruwen <iruwen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Re: [PATCH 3/3] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Update to mdadm V3.2.5 => RAID starts to recover (reproducible)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Installing CentOS 6.4 on DDF fake RAID with mdadm
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] When hit a read error, retry request with R5_ReadNoMerge flag.
- From: y b <ycbzzjlby@xxxxxxxxx>
- Update to mdadm V3.2.5 => RAID starts to recover (reproducible)
- From: Andreas Baer <synthetic.gods@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Accesses to not yet running array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Accesses to not yet running array
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: Recovery of RAID1 fails (added disks stays as spare)
- From: <Matthias.Blaesing@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: off - info about servers and linux mail lists
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- off - info about servers and linux mail lists
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Fix apparent cut-and-paste error in super_90_validate
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Small chunk size read performance penalty
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fix apparent cut-and-paste error in super_90_validate
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] raid1: Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] radi1: Relace raise_barrier/lower_barrrier with freeze_array/unfreeze_array for reconfigure the array.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] raid1: Add a filed freeze_array to indicate whether raid in freeze state.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 0/3 V2] Rewrite the implementation of iobarrier for raid1.
- From: majianpeng <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovery of RAID1 fails (added disks stays as spare)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RE: Recovery of RAID1 fails (added disks stays as spare)
- From: <Matthias.Blaesing@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Small chunk size read performance penalty
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Small chunk size read performance penalty
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Small chunk size read performance penalty
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Does the chunk size of RAID5 really mean the "smallest atomic" mass of data?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Does the chunk size of RAID5 really mean the "smallest atomic" mass of data?
- From: taejin1999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Small chunk size read performance penalty
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Small chunk size read performance penalty
- From: Ian Pilcher <arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid5: a problem of repeat recovery
- From: wangkaird <wangkaird@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovery of RAID1 fails (added disks stays as spare)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] DDF: export_examine_super_ddf: print MD_DEVICES
- [PATCH 5/6] in_initrd: fix gcc compiler error
- [PATCH 6/6] mdmon: allow disabling "@dmon" command name at compile time
- [PATCH 4/6] DDF: increase default value for safe_mode_delay to 4000ms
- [PATCH 0/6] Fixes for installation of CentOS 6 on DDF BIOS RAID
- [PATCH 1/6] DDF: ddf_activate_spare: fix gcc -O2 uninitialized warning
- [PATCH 3/6] DDF: container_content_ddf: set safe_mode_delay > 0
- Re: Request for help with "1st time through" RAID array renaming
- From: ariel.work@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: qindehua <qindehua@xxxxxxx>
- Recovery of RAID1 fails (added disks stays as spare)
- From: <Matthias.Blaesing@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Request for help with "1st time through" RAID array renaming
- From: ariel.work@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Request for help with "1st time through" RAID array renaming
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RAID problem
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RAID problem
- From: fixitdad5@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Request for help with "1st time through" RAID array renaming
- From: ariel.work@xxxxxxxxxx
- Request for help with "1st time through" RAID array renaming
- From: ariel.work@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator
- From: Ed L Cashin <ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [BUG] md hang at schedule in md_write_start
- From: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Wes <wt75@xxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 3/3] raid5: relieve lock contention in get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 2/3] wait: add wait_event_cmd()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 1/3] raid5: rename stripe_hash()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 0/3] raid5: relieve lock contention of get_active_stripe()
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 2/3 v2] raid5: sysfs entry to control worker thread number
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 3/3 v2] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 1/3 v2] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 0/3 v2] raid5: make stripe handling multi-threading
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from two almost simultaneously failed devices in RAID1
- From: Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from two almost simultaneously failed devices in RAID1
- From: Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from two almost simultaneously failed devices in RAID1
- From: Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovering from two almost simultaneously failed devices in RAID1
- From: Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Recovering from two almost simultaneously failed devices in RAID1
- From: Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 18/22] block: Generic bio chaining
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator
- From: Ed Cashin <ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator
- From: Ed Cashin <ecashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/22] block: Abstract out bvec iterator
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 read io balancing algorithm
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid1 read io balancing algorithm
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid1 read io balancing algorithm
- From: <struhlo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: handling of missing disks in DDF
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] Create: set array status to frozen until monitoring starts
- From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DDF test fails if default udev rules are active
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 9/9] Create: set array status to frozen until monitoring starts
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tests/10ddf-fail-two-spares: new unit test
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] RAID: add tilegx SIMD implementation of raid6
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: handling of missing disks in DDF
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- RFC: handling of missing disks in DDF
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/22] Immutable biovecs, block layer changes
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/22] bcache: Kill unaligned bvec hack
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/22] block: Consolidate duplicated bio_trim() implementations
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/22] block: Use rw_copy_check_uvector()
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/22] block: Convert bio_iovec() to bvec_iter
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/22] block: Convert bio_copy_data() to bvec_iter
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/22] block: Immutable bio vecs
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/22] bio-integrity: Convert to bvec_iter
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/22] block: Kill bio_segments()/bi_vcnt usage
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/22] dm: Use bvec_iter for dm_bio_record()
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/22] block: Convert drivers to immutable biovecs
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 15/22] rbd: Refactor bio cloning, don't clone biovecs
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 19/22] block: Rename bio_split() -> bio_pair_split()
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 18/22] block: Generic bio chaining
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 17/22] block: Remove bi_idx hacks
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 16/22] dm: Refactor for new bio cloning/splitting
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/22] ceph: Convert to immutable biovecs
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 20/22] block: Introduce new bio_split()
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 21/22] block: Kill bio_pair_split()
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/22] block: Kill bio_iovec_idx(), __bio_iovec()
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 22/22] block: Don't save/copy bvec array anymore, share when cloning
- From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] tests/10ddf-fail-two-spares: new unit test
- [PATCH] RAID: add tilegx SIMD implementation of raid6
- From: Ken Steele <ken@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DDF: regression caused by 273989b9 / ce45c819
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm --fail on RAID0 array
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: DDF test fails if default udev rules are active
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/9] tests/10ddf-fail-spare: more sophisticated result checks
- [PATCH 9/9] Create: set array status to frozen until monitoring starts
- [PATCH 8/9] DDF: ddf_open_new: check device status for new subarray
- [PATCH 7/9] tests/10ddf-fail-create-race: test handling of fail/create race
- Patches related to current discussion
- mdadm --fail on RAID0 array
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- DDF: regression caused by 273989b9 / ce45c819
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: when md raid1 superblock is bad block, what happens
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: when md raid1 superblock is bad block, what happens
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- when md raid1 superblock is bad block, what happens
- From: Dong Wu <archer.wudong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] test: allow LVM volumes or RAM disks as test devices
- [PATCH 4/5] DDF: get_extents: don't allocate space on failed disks
- [PATCH 3/5] tests/10ddf-fail-spare: new unit test
- [PATCH 2/5] tests/10ddf-fail-twice: remove hard-coded assumptions
- [PATCH 1/5] tests/env-ddf-template: some helper functions
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- when md raid1 superblock is bad block, what happens
- From: "archer.wudong" <archer.wudong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: question about mdmon --takeover
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport: mdmon will not start with latest git version when using ddf container
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix checking completion of RAID10 resync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mdmon: let mdmon know the layout
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DDF: ddf_process_update: delete removed disks from dlist
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: help needed restoring data
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Advice for recovering array containing LUKS encrypted LVM volumes
- From: P Orrifolius <porrifolius@xxxxxxxxx>
- help needed restoring data
- From: Uwe Wächter <uwe.waechter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Sam Bingner <sam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Keld Jørn Simonsen <keld@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/4] DDF: ddf_process_update: delete removed disks from dlist
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] mdmon: let mdmon know the layout
- From: Lukasz Dorau <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] tests/10ddf-fail-twice: New unit test
- [PATCH 3/4] DDF: ddf_process_update: delete removed disks from dlist
- [PATCH 2/4] DDF: no need for GET_LAYOUT any more
- [PATCH 1/4] mdmon: always get layout from sysfs
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC swap over raid1
- From: Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- RFC swap over raid1
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Bugreport ddf rebuild problems
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] imsm: fix checking completion of RAID10 resync
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] imsm: fix checking completion of RAID10 resync
- From: "Dorau, Lukasz" <lukasz.dorau@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport: mdmon will not start with latest git version when using ddf container
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport: mdmon will not start with latest git version when using ddf container
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Bugreport: mdmon will not start with latest git version when using ddf container
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Bugreport: mdmon will not start with latest git version when using ddf container
- From: Albert Pauw <albert.pauw@xxxxxxxxx>
- question about mdmon --takeover
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reshape/Grow to fewer but bigger devices
- From: Christian Nilsson <nikize@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reshape/Grow to fewer but bigger devices
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tests/env-ddf-template: helper for new unit test
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] tests/env-ddf-template: helper for new unit test
- Re: [PATCH 06/10] monitor: read_and_act: log status when called
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reshape/Grow to fewer but bigger devices
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: ddf: remove failed devices that are no longer in use ?!?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/10] Two bug fixes and a lot of debug code
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/10] monitor: read_and_act: log status when called
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Reshape/Grow to fewer but bigger devices
- From: Christian Nilsson <nikize@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] imsm: fix checking completion of RAID10 resync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] Avoid double close()
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/10] mdmon: manage_member: fix race condition during slow meta data writes
- [PATCH 10/10] tests/10ddf-create-fail-rebuild: new unit test for DDF
- [PATCH 07/10] mdmon: wait_and_act: fix debug message for SIGUSR1
- [PATCH 05/10] DDF: ddf_set_disk: add some debug messages
- [PATCH 06/10] monitor: read_and_act: log status when called
- [PATCH 08/10] mdmon: manage_member: debug messages for array state
- [PATCH 03/10] DDF: ddf_process_update: log offsets for conf changes
- [PATCH 04/10] DDF: load_ddf_header: more error logging
- [PATCH 01/10] DDF: ddf_activate_spare: bugfix for 62ff3c40
- [PATCH 02/10] DDF: log disk status changes more nicely
- [PATCH 00/10] Two bug fixes and a lot of debug code
- Re: Suspicious test failure - mdmon misses recovery events on loop devices
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: ddf: remove failed devices that are no longer in use ?!?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] Avoid double close()
- From: Jes.Sorensen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] imsm: fix checking completion of RAID10 resync
- From: Pawel Baldysiak <pawel.baldysiak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 3/3] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch 3/3] raid5: only wakeup necessary threads
- [patch 2/3] raid5: sysfs entry to control worker thread number
- [patch 1/3] raid5: offload stripe handle to workqueue
- [patch 0/3] raid5: make stripe handling multi-threading
- Re: Recovery possible after partial reshape failure?
- From: Veedar Hokstadt <veedar@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ddf: remove failed devices that are no longer in use ?!?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] Basic hotspare handling for RAID10
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Suspicious test failure - mdmon misses recovery events on loop devices
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Mdadm server eating drives
- From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Suspicious test failure - mdmon misses recovery events on loop devices
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Suspicious test failure - mdmon misses recovery events on loop devices
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Suspicious test failure - mdmon misses recovery events on loop devices
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [patch]raid5: fix stripe release order
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md/raid5: raid5d livelocks after drive failure during resync
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: md/raid5: raid5d livelocks after drive failure during resync
- From: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Recovery help? 4-disk RAID5 double-failure, but good disks have event count mismatch.
- From: Phil Turmel <philip@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Wes <wt75@xxxxxxxxx>
- Recovery help? 4-disk RAID5 double-failure, but good disks have event count mismatch.
- From: Richard Michael <rmichael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- ddf: remove failed devices that are no longer in use ?!?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Suspicious test failure - mdmon misses recovery events on loop devices
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -Db switches array to write-pending?!
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: mdadm -Db switches array to write-pending?!
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PULL REQUEST] 2 more bug fixes for md in 3.11
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Roberto Spadim <rspadim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] DDF: find_vdcr: fix minor bug in debug message
- [PATCH 4/4] DDF: ddf_activate_spare: fix metadata update for SVDs
- [PATCH 3/4] DDF: ddf_activate_spare: only activate good drives
- [PATCH 2/4] DDF: ddf_activate_spare: Add RAID10 code
- [PATCH 0/4] Basic hotspare handling for RAID10
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Wes <wt75@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Wes <wt75@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- raid10 centos5 vs. centos6 300% worse random write performance
- From: Wes <wt75@xxxxxxxxx>
- [patch]raid5: fix stripe release order
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Preparing for mdadm-3.3
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: qindehua <qindehua@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Help creating filesystem (xfs) and partitioning
- From: Roberto Spadim <roberto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should "mdadm --add" complain if the new device appears to have a filesystem on it?
- From: Piergiorgio Sartor <piergiorgio.sartor@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: shown disk sizes
- From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should "mdadm --add" complain if the new device appears to have a filesystem on it?
- From: Christian Iversen <chrivers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- MD array keeps resyncing after rebooting
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should "mdadm --add" complain if the new device appears to have a filesystem on it?
- From: Holger Kiehl <Holger.Kiehl@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] md: set write-intent bit first in sync-bitmap for rwm in non-insync region.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] md: add sync-bitmap to only resync WRITTEN data when adding new disk in raid array.
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/6] DDF: safe big-endian types
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Should "mdadm --add" complain if the new device appears to have a filesystem on it?
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: qindehua <qindehua@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] mdadm: add sync-bitmap to only resync WRITTEN data when adding new disk in raid array.
- From: Robin Dong <robin.k.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2 v2] md: set write-intent bit first in sync-bitmap for rwm in non-insync region.
- From: Robin Dong <robin.k.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2 v2] md: add sync-bitmap to only resync WRITTEN data when adding new disk in raid array.
- From: Robin Dong <robin.k.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problem with disk replacement
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] DDF: add endian-safe typedefs
- [PATCH 2/6] DDF: convert big endian to be32 type
- [PATCH 4/6] DDF: convert big-endian __u16 to be16 type
- [PATCH 5/6] DDF: add_other_bvd: fix endianness bug
- [PATCH 3/6] DDF: convert big-endian __u64 to be64 type
- [PATCH 6/6] DDF: ddf_set_disk: fix minor endianness bug
- [RFC/PATCH 0/6] DDF: safe big-endian types
- Re: How does md(adm) work with fake-raid ?
- From: Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: How does md(adm) work with fake-raid ?
- From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@xxxxxxxxx>
- 3.10.1: echo repair > sync_action causes hang on RAID-1 (2 x SSD)
- From: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux RAID Wiki]
[ATA RAID]
[Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]
[Linux Block]
[Linux IDE]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]
[Device Mapper]
[Kernel]
[Linux Admin]
[Linux Net]
[GFS]
[RPM]
[git]
[Yosemite Forum]
[Linux Networking]