PS even my emails don't fit my phone. I have to move them across to read the right side text.
-------- Original message --------
From: Guy Glorieux <guy.glorieux@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 7/2/25 1:18 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: photoforum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PhotoForum] PF gallery on June 29, 2025 - food for thought
Hello Andy,
Thanks for asking.
Some pictures are so large, at times, I just don't bother to look!
So, I think it's a good idea to go back to 1000 pixels.
Now, I'm not sure if I send directly from my phone if that will fit the requirement.
I should check.
Happy July 4th!
Guy
Le dim. 29 juin 2025, à 11 h 44, Andrew Davidhazy <andpph@xxxxxxx> a écrit :
Question: with suggested image size loosened do you find it a hindrance that some images are so large that they are too large to easily be viewed? Should we stick to something close to 1000 pixels in longer dimension (unless obvious panoramic)?
Roy Miller - Drapery
Herschel Mair -
Thane Thurmond - Striped Barbados Lilly
Bob McCulloch - The Pub
Jay Bjerkan - Acorn Woodpecker
Andrew Davidhazy - Neighborhood landscape
Lea Murphy - Edyn at the Park.
Dan Mitchell - Papaver
Note that in every photograph's page there is mailto link to send feedback or comments about it to the list.
To participate in this activity send your contributions early (suggestion: near 1500 pix in longest dimension and 300Kb in maximum size). If need be the staff will adjust them for exhibition. Send to andpph@xxxxxxx and please state GALLERY on mail subject line.
This week's FotoFeature thumbnail by Herschel Mair, untitled, is attached.
PS: do you know of other persons who might be interested in subscribing to PhotoForum? See below:
FYI - to increase the visibility of the weekly collection, direct URLs to author's pages are now a part of the Facebook announcement of the gallery. Note that the URL to the pages has this form:
