|
I I assume you meant decent resolution...I've
been viewing images in the gallery since 1999 and this is the
first time I've had to scroll 4 of them to see the entire
image...I see no value in this...the image should be visible in
it's entirety on a single page...for the record I'm on a Mac
running OS Monterey and my monitor is a retina 5K 27 inch...
On 6/30/25 15:21, Herschel Mair wrote:
That would depend on your monitor size and
your browser settings. I'd rathger scroll and have dent
resolution that have a lower esolution image that
doesn't need scrolling.
|
4 of this weeks image required I scroll
to see the entire image...not good in my
humble opinion...prefer to see the entire
image without having to scroll...
On 6/29/25 08:44, Andrew Davidhazy
wrote:
Question: with suggested image size loosened do you find it a hindrance that some images are so large that they are too large to easily be viewed? Should we stick to something close to 1000 pixels in longer dimension (unless obvious panoramic)?
The PhotoForum members' gallery/exhibit space was updated on June 29, 2025. Authors with work now on display at: https://people.rit.edu/andpph/gallery.html include:
Roy Miller - Drapery
Herschel Mair -
Thane Thurmond - Striped Barbados Lilly
Bob McCulloch - The Pub
Jay Bjerkan - Acorn Woodpecker
Andrew Davidhazy - Neighborhood landscape
Lea Murphy - Edyn at the Park.
Dan Mitchell - Papaver
|
|
|
--
![]()
505.310.2086
|
|
|
|
