Re: Photograph vs. illustration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I’ve stayed away from any AI until about two weeks ago when I needed to generate some labels for my sister’s restaurant that mimicked vintage oil can labels.

My socks were completely blown off by what could be done with a minimum of prompting. To say I was flabbergasted is not an overstatement.

It turned out that they were TOO AI so I ended up building them by hand and they look great.

My partner regularly uses ChatGPT to create text content in her work—website, newsletter, memos—and loves it. I’ve not used it that way. 

It’s an interesting slope to be sure.

Beautiful image, Hershel. Very well done. 

Lea



your kids . my camera . we’ll click


On Jun 29, 2025, at 10:52 AM, Andrew Davidhazy <andpph@xxxxxxx> wrote:






Food for thought ... Herschel's photograph raises a topic of conversation I think.

It is an excellent image for sure. Should anyone quibble about the fact it was significantly assembled/modified by and "AI" device? What if it had been totally a creation of AI ... well, directed by a human at least? Will machines create images on their own without being prompted? Is the end product the important thing regardless of who or how it was produced?

There is more to this than my tiny brain can deal with.  :)

Andy



This message was sent to subscribers of <b>PhotoForum educational network</b> ("https://lists.rit.edu/sympa/info/photoforum").

Unsubscribe: https://lists.rit.edu/manage/unsubscribe.php?listname=photoforum&email=lea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&uuid=&id=CH3PR16MB6404C3C176D4E3D4780D1D08CC47A





This message was sent to subscribers of PhotoForum educational network. Click Unsubscribe to be removed.


[Index of Archives] [Share Photos] [Epson Inkjet] [Scanner List] [Gimp Users] [Gimp for Windows]

  Powered by Linux