> On Apr 27, 2025, at 06:54, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I agree with him, though, that this a foot-gun: most table's aren't that UPDATE heavy. There is plenty of precedent for GUCs that seem to be useful, but really should never be touched except in the case of fairly uncommon workloads. However, that doesn't mean we should add new ones. :-)
