On 16/4/25 15:36, Ron Johnson wrote:
ok, but log_statement prints ROLLBACKs/COMMITs, but pgaudit not.
pgaudit is statement-level, not transaction-level; that's its nature. This is the same as log_statement.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 5:10 AM Achilleas Mantzios - cloud <a.mantzios@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 4/15/25 12:14, KENAN ÇİFTÇİ wrote:
One issue we have with pgaudit is that it prints AUDIT records even if the xaction gets rollbacked, how do you alleviate that ?Hi,
You can use pgaudit and pgauditlogtofile extension (https://github.com/fmbiete/pgauditlogtofile) together to write audit logs in a separate file.
yours,
Kenan Çiftçi
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 1:44 PM vijay patil <vijay.postgres@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi All,
We are exploring auditing solutions for our PostgreSQL database and are considering using
pgaudit
for this purpose. However, we have a few questions:
What is the best tool for auditing PostgreSQL databases?
We are specifically looking for a solution that offers detailed auditing capabilities and is compatible with our setup.
Can we store the audit information separately from PostgreSQL logs if we decide to use
pgaudit
?
We would prefer to keep the audit logs in a separate file or location for easier management and analysis.
We appreciate any help or suggestions!
Thanks
Vijay
--
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!
You'll have to bring that up with the PgAudit maintainer. Note, though, that the purpose of PgAudit is not "recreate the database from audit logs"; it's "what Auditors care about". In my experience, auditors do not care about COMMIT and ROLLBACK statements.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 1:35 PM Achilleas Mantzios <a.mantzios@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
<Redacted> lobster!