Re: inefficient/wrong plan cache mode selection for queries with partitioned tables (postgresql 17)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 6:33 PM Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Maxim Boguk <maxim.boguk@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> And the problem is that the cost of a custom plan ignores the cost of
> planning itself (which is like 2x orders of magnitude worse than the cost
> of real time partition pruning of a generic plan).

False.  The estimate is evidently pretty wrong, but it's not that
there is no consideration at all.  See around line 1370 in
src/backend/utils/cache/plancache.c.

                        regards, tom lane

Thank you.
Reading the code - probably the lowest hanging fruit is to make
'The current multiplier of 1000 * cpu_operator_cost' configurable in the future versions.

PS: it's always nice to see when my ad-hoc idea (about N*nrelations as cost planner estimate) is already implemented.


--
Maxim Boguk
Senior Postgresql DBA

Phone UA: +380 99 143 0000
Phone AU: +61  45 218 5678


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux