They are using explicit transaction block and also got he root cause. They to provide the commit explicitly.
Thanks & Regards
Gambhir Singh
Gambhir Singh
On Wed, 7 May 2025 at 19:01, Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 7:16 AM Gambhir Singh <gambhir.singh05@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi,Application team was executing UPDATE statement in DB through Abinitio graph. When they trigger a job, a session is spawned in DB, in parallel another session is also spawned and executed the same UPDATE statement.
When I checked the locks in DB, I found that both the sessions are updating the same record. My concern is how UPDATE causes locking in DB.
Here is how MVCC works. If one session is updating a record, it should release the lock once it updated the row and other one should be able to acquire the row lock. Maybe I am wrong, please suggest how to handle this situation.Do the applications use implicit autocommit, or do they use explicit transaction blocks?--Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.Don't boil me, I'm still alive.<Redacted> lobster!
