Re: Stateless NAT in nftables with maps for performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Stateless NAT in nftables with maps for performance
From: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 14:23:46 +0200
Cc: "netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <netfilter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <aMQMg33uIM63vKAC@strlen.de>
References: <1643443761.529082.1757676483522@email.ionos.com> <aMQMg33uIM63vKAC@strlen.de>

Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ip daddr set ip daddr map @dnat_map

Forgot the usual disclaimer: this breaks icmp(v6).

There is a reason for existence of stateful nat after all.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stateless NAT in nftables with maps for performance
  - From: Juan Carlos Lazcano

References:
- Stateless NAT in nftables with maps for performance
  - From: Juan Carlos Lazcano
- Re: Stateless NAT in nftables with maps for performance
  - From: Florian Westphal

Prev by Date: Re: Stateless NAT in nftables with maps for performance
Next by Date: Re: Stateless NAT in nftables with maps for performance
Previous by thread: Re: Stateless NAT in nftables with maps for performance
Next by thread: Re: Stateless NAT in nftables with maps for performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Netfilter Development] [Linux Kernel Networking Development] [Netem] [Berkeley Packet Filter] [Linux Kernel Development] [Advanced Routing & Traffice Control] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux