Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: br_netfilter: reread nf_conn from skb after confirm()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2025/8/20 19:31, Florian Westphal 写道:
Wang Liang <wangliang74@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Previous commit 2d72afb34065 ("netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix crash due to
removal of uninitialised entry") move the IPS_CONFIRMED assignment after
the hash table insertion.
How is that related to this change?
As you write below, the bug came in with 62e7151ae3eb.


Before the commit 2d72afb34065, __nf_conntrack_confirm() set
'ct->status |= IPS_CONFIRMED;' before check hash, the warning will not
happen, so I put it here.

As you say, the bug came in with 62e7151ae3eb. I will delete this paragraph
in next patch.

To solve the hash conflict, nf_ct_resolve_clash() try to merge the
conntracks, and update skb->_nfct. However, br_nf_local_in() still use the
old ct from local variable 'nfct' after confirm(), which leads to this
issue. Fix it by rereading nfct from skb.

Fixes: 62e7151ae3eb ("netfilter: bridge: confirm multicast packets before passing them up the stack")
Signed-off-by: Wang Liang <wangliang74@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
index 94cbe967d1c1..55b1b7dcb609 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -626,6 +626,7 @@ static unsigned int br_nf_local_in(void *priv,
  		break;
  	}
+ nfct = skb_nfct(skb);
  	ct = container_of(nfct, struct nf_conn, ct_general);
  	WARN_ON_ONCE(!nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct));
There is a second bug here, confirm can return NF_DROP and
nfct will be NULL.


Thanks for your suggestion!

Do you mean that ct may be deleted in confirm and return NF_DROP, so we can
not visit it in br_nf_local_in() and need to add 'case NF_DROP:' here?

I cannot find somewhere set skb->_nfct to NULL and return NF_DROP. Can you
give some hints?

------
Best regards
Wang Liang


Can you make this change too? (or something similar)?

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
index 94cbe967d1c1..69b7b7c7565e 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -619,8 +619,9 @@ static unsigned int br_nf_local_in(void *priv,
         nf_bridge_pull_encap_header(skb);
         ret = ct_hook->confirm(skb);
         switch (ret & NF_VERDICT_MASK) {
+       case NF_DROP:
         case NF_STOLEN:
-               return NF_STOLEN;
+               return ret;


nfct reload seems correct, thanks for catching this.




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux