Hi, On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 01:08:26AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: [...] > 'make testrun' sounds nicer than my run-it-all shell script proposal, > it would be nice to have a short summary at the test run not to scroll > up to find each individual test result. And I think 'make testrun' > should continue on errors so it is also useful for testing patches > under development. After a second look (and with Jan's distcheck fix patch in mind) I found a way to distinguish between 'make distcheck' calling 'make check' and a user doing so. This way we can use 'make check' as it is intended and leverage automake's test suite integration while at the same time keep 'make distcheck' untouched. I'll send a new series once I have collected what's really needed for it. Cheers, Phil
