Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Changes in v3: > > - static nf_flow_table_switchdev_nb. > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Unchanged, only tags RFC net-next to PATCH nf-next. > > > > Eric Woudstra (3): > > netfilter: flow: Add bridge_vid member > > netfilter: nf_flow_table_core: teardown direct xmit when destination > > changed > > netfilter: nf_flow_table_ip: don't follow fastpath when marked > > teardown > > > > include/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table.h | 2 + > > net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c | 6 +++ > > net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c | 3 ++ > > 4 files changed, 77 insertions(+) > > > > What is the status of this patch-set? Is it still being considered to be > applied? Should I re-submit it? Anything I can do, please let me know. Its marked as 'Changes Requested' in patchwork but I see no feedback on patchwork or lore archives. Pablo, do you have any objections to this patchset? AFAICS this is ok and I'd apply this patchset.
