Running new 'set_flush_add_atomic_bitmap' test case for nftables.git
with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y yields:
net/netfilter/nft_set_bitmap.c:231 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
1 lock held by nft/4008:
#0: ffff888147f79cd8 (&nft_net->commit_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: nf_tables_valid_genid+0x2f/0xd0
lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x116/0x160
nft_bitmap_walk+0x22d/0x240
nf_tables_delsetelem+0x1010/0x1a00
..
This is a false positive, the list cannot be altered while the
transaction mutex is held, so pass the relevant argument to the iterator.
Fixes tag intentionally wrong; no point in picking this up if earlier
false-positive-fixups were not applied.
Fixes: 28b7a6b84c0a ("netfilter: nf_tables: avoid false-positive lockdep splats in set walker")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
---
net/netfilter/nft_set_bitmap.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_set_bitmap.c b/net/netfilter/nft_set_bitmap.c
index c24c922f895d..8d3f040a904a 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_set_bitmap.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_set_bitmap.c
@@ -226,7 +226,8 @@ static void nft_bitmap_walk(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
const struct nft_bitmap *priv = nft_set_priv(set);
struct nft_bitmap_elem *be;
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(be, &priv->list, head) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(be, &priv->list, head,
+ lockdep_is_held(&nft_pernet(ctx->net)->commit_mutex)) {
if (iter->count < iter->skip)
goto cont;
--
2.49.1
