On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > Hi Pablo, > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 08:39:40PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 06:57:52PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > [...] > > > distcheck-hook: could set a env var so test just print a [SKIP]. > > > > > > Similar to your previous approach with the env var, but logic reversed. > > > > I don't think the 'make distcheck-hook' call is able to inject variables > > into the following 'make check' call's environment. It could create a > > special file though which all test suites recognize and exit 77 > > immediately. > > What are your thoughts about this? IMO, the special configure option is > much cleaner than creating a special file and patching all test runners > to check for it. Yes, makes sense, thanks.
