Re: [nft PATCH] doc: nft.8: Minor NAT STATEMENTS section review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 12:52:58PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> Synopsis insinuates an IP address argument is mandatory in snat/dnat
> statements although specifying ports alone is perfectly fine. Adjust it
> accordingly and add a paragraph briefly describing the behaviour.
> 
> While at it, update the redirect statement description with more
> relevant examples, the current one is wrong: To *only* alter the
> destination port, dnat statement must be used, not redirect.
> 
> Fixes: 6908a677ba04c ("nft.8: Enhance NAT documentation")
> Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@xxxxxx>

Patch applied.




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux