Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send_unreach cgroup_skb kfunc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 7/28/25 2:43 AM, Mahe Tardy wrote:
This is needed in the context of Tetragon to provide improved feedback
(in contrast to just dropping packets) to east-west traffic when blocked
by policies using cgroup_skb programs.

This reuse concepts from netfilter reject target codepath with the
differences that:
* Packets are cloned since the BPF user can still return SK_PASS from
   the cgroup_skb progs and the current skb need to stay untouched

This needs more details. Which field(s) of the skb are changed by the kfunc, the skb_dst_set in ip[6]_route_reply_fetch_dst() and/or the code path in the icmp[v6]_send() ?

   (cgroup_skb hooks only allow read-only skb payload).
* Since cgroup_skb programs are called late in the stack, checksums do
   not need to be computed or verified, and IPv4 fragmentation does not
   need to be checked (ip_local_deliver should take care of that
   earlier).

Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  net/core/filter.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 7a72f766aacf..050872324575 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -85,6 +85,10 @@
  #include <linux/un.h>
  #include <net/xdp_sock_drv.h>
  #include <net/inet_dscp.h>
+#include <linux/icmp.h>
+#include <net/icmp.h>
+#include <net/route.h>
+#include <net/ip6_route.h>

  #include "dev.h"

@@ -12148,6 +12152,53 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_sock_ops_enable_tx_tstamp(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *skops,
  	return 0;
  }

+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_icmp_send_unreach(struct __sk_buff *__skb, int code)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *)__skb;
+	struct sk_buff *nskb;
+
+	switch (skb->protocol) {
+	case htons(ETH_P_IP):
+		if (code < 0 || code > NR_ICMP_UNREACH)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+		if (!nskb)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		if (ip_route_reply_fetch_dst(nskb) < 0) {
+			kfree_skb(nskb);
+			return -EHOSTUNREACH;
+		}
+
+		icmp_send(nskb, ICMP_DEST_UNREACH, code, 0);
+		kfree_skb(nskb);
+		break;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+	case htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
+		if (code < 0 || code > ICMPV6_REJECT_ROUTE)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
+		if (!nskb)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		if (ip6_route_reply_fetch_dst(nskb) < 0) {

From a very quick look at icmpv6_send(), it does its own route lookup. I haven't looked at the v4 yet.

I am likely missing some details. Can you explain why it needs to do a lookup before calling icmpv6_send()?

+			kfree_skb(nskb);
+			return -EHOSTUNREACH;
+		}
+
+		icmpv6_send(nskb, ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH, code, 0);
+		kfree_skb(nskb);
+		break;
+#endif
+	default:
+		return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
+	}
+
+	return SK_DROP;
+}
+




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux