Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > These three expressions use the same layout but they have a different > purpose, it is better to split them in independent layouts. Agreed. > This is implicitly reducing the size of one of the largest structs > in the union area of struct expr, still EXPR_SET_ELEM remains the > largest so no gain is achieved in this iteration. Still, I'm all for reducing the number of anon structs in the union and remove the SET/LIST/CONCAT joint struct. Please, feel free to push this out.
