Re: [PATCH] tools: add a systemd unit for static rulesets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 02:29:46PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
>
> On 3/5/25 22:35, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > I added a few more people to Cc.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 09:59:35PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > > There is a customer request (bugreport) for wanting to trivially load a ruleset
> > > from a well-known location on boot, forwarded to me by M. Gerstner. A systemd
> > > service unit is hereby added to provide that functionality. This is based on
> > > various distributions attempting to do same, cf.
> > >
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nftables/tree/rawhide
> > > https://gitlab.alpinelinux.org/alpine/aports/-/blob/master/main/nftables/
> > > nftables.initd
> > > https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/nftables
> > Any chance to Cc these maintainers too? Given this is closer to
> > downstream than upstream, I would like to understand if this could
> > cause any hypothetical interference with distro packagers.
> >
> > Only subtle nitpick I see with this patch is that INSTALL file is not
> > updated to provide information on how to use --with-unitdir=.
> >
>
> I have mixed feelings about having this systemd service file in this repository.
> Will this file be maintained wrt. systemd ecosystem updates? Or will it be
> outdated and neglected after a few years?
>
> For most folks, I assume they will run nftables via firewalld or any other
> ruleset manager, unless they know what they are doing. And if they know what
> they are doing (i.e, they have crafted their own firewalling system), then
> most likely the systemd config in this repo is ignored.
>
>
http://www.slackware.com/ doesn't use systemd




[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [Berkeley Packet Filter]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux