Re: [PATCH] xfs: remove some EXPERIMENTAL warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 09:34:24PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 08:53:01AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Online fsck was finished a year ago, in Linux 6.10.  The exchange-range
> > syscall and parent pointers were merged in the same cycle.  None of
> > these have encountered any serious errors in the year that they've been
> > in the kernel (or the many many years they've been under development) so
> > let's drop the shouty warnings.
> 
> Looks good.  Talking about experimental warnings, I'd also like to
> drop the pnfs warning.  The code has been around forever, and while
> we found occasional issues in the nfsd side of it, they were quickly
> fixed.

I agree, let's drop the pnfs warning since warts or not the code has
been stable for a long time.  However, would you (hch) mind writing that
patch since you're the author of xfs_pnfs.c and I've never even used it.

--D




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux