Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs_io: make statx mask parsing more generally useful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs_io: make statx mask parsing more generally useful
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 08:44:21 -0700
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20250423153352.GF25675@frogsfrogsfrogs>
References: <20250416052134.GB25675@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20250416052251.GC25675@frogsfrogsfrogs> <aAc1UtYb2HL3w5T_@infradead.org> <20250423153352.GF25675@frogsfrogsfrogs>

On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 08:33:52AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Hrm.  Nothing in fstests uses it AFAICT so maybe we could just get rid
> of the -m option.  Or we could redefine "all" to map to ~1U so it
> actually does what that word means?

The latter sounds reasonable to me.

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] xfs_io: catch statx fields up to 6.15
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- [PATCH 2/2] xfs_io: make statx mask parsing more generally useful
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs_io: make statx mask parsing more generally useful
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs_io: make statx mask parsing more generally useful
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs_io: make statx mask parsing more generally useful
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v8 05/15] xfs: ignore HW which cannot atomic write a single block
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs_io: make statx mask parsing more generally useful
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfs_io: catch statx fields up to 6.15
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux